In the article obiective characteristics of significant groups of remote territories (remote border territories; remote hard–to-reach territories; remote coastal territories; remote enclave territories) are systematized. Taking into account these characteristics the directions of state policy in relation to the territories of each group are iustified. Recommendations have been developed for the implementation of state policy measures taking into account the duration of the possible positive consequences and the necessary financial costs. Obiective restrictions affecting the nature of state measures in relation to remote territories are iustified.
2. Malahova O.B. Gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie social’no-ekonomicheskih sistem prigranichnyh territorii // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2008. № 4 (85). S. 71–75.
3. Smirnov O.A., Gorshkov V.V. Institucional’nye usloviya implementacii koncepcii gibkih transportnyh sistem v Rossiiskoi Federacii dlya obespecheniya dostupnosti trudnodostupnyh territorii // Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. 2019. T. 9. № 9-1. S. 387–392.
4. Mazurov V.D., Gilyov D.V. Matematicheskaya model’ optimal’nogo razmeshcheniya i razvitiya uchrezhdenii social’noi sfery v udalennyh i trudnodostupnyh territoriyah // Innovacionnaya nauka. 2015. № 12-3. S. 28–29.
5. Serbicheva T.L., Reimer V.V. Problemy vneshneekonomicheskogo sotrudnichestva v prigranichnyh territoriyah Dal’nevostochnogo federal’nogo okruga // Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Social’no-ekonomicheskie nauki. 2007. T. 7. № 1. S. 93–97.
6. Andreev A.B., Andreeva T.V. Strategicheskoe razvitie transgranichnyh regionov (Respublika Buryatiya – Mongoliya – Avtonomnyi raion Vnutrennyaya Mongoliya): monografiya. Ulan-Ude: Izd-vo Buryatskogo gosuniversiteta, 2016. 154 s.
7. Stepan’ko N.G. Formirovanie ekologo-ekonomicheskoi situacii na prigranichnyh territoriyah (na primere Primorskogo kraya i provincii Heilunczyan) // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Geografiya. Geoekologiya. 2017. № 4. S. 60–64.
8. Zhdanov V.P., Zverev Yu.M. Sravnitel’naya harakteristika urovnya i dinamiki social’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Kaliningradskoi oblasti i prigranichnyh territorii (Pol’sha, Litva) // Region sotrudnichestva. 2004. № 2. S. 5–14.
9. Gumenyuk I.S., Orlov S.V. Kaliningradskaya oblast’ kak territoriya potencial’nogo formirovaniya transportnogo klastera primorskogo regiona // Baltiiskii region. 2014. № 3 (21). S. 121–131.
10. Arsent’eva I.I., Mihailenko A.N. Rossiiskii i kitaiskii podhody k razvitiyu prigranichnyh territorii: sravnitel’nyi analiz. // Vestnik Zabaikal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 5 (84). S. 70–75.
11. Bozhko L.L. Konceptual’nye podhody k opredeleniyu prigranichnyh territorii // Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika. 2010. № 4. S. 47–54.